Jamaica is in the throes of a National Security crisis with its citizenry largely overcome with fear now willing to embrace any one who they perceive can improve their security with almost messianic fervor. Indeed, it is not uncommon, particularly in the more affluent communities for there to be discussions about a willingness to cede some of their human rights in the hope that this will foster greater successes in crime fighting. However in large part, the more affluent communities and the inner city communities in Jamaica are worlds apart and are driven by a different dynamic which has implications for an optimized security strategy.
While persons in the poorer quintiles rely on the JCF and JDF for protection, those in the wealthier quintiles tend to access additional protection from the private security firms. Security responses to areas populated by those in the upper quintiles also tend to be faster from both the JCF and private security firms. Hence given that security remains a primary concern for most of the island, for meaningful solutions to be determined, there needs to be even a notional understanding of the issues that confront all groupings, irrespective of social stratification. In Part I, focus was placed on the security concerns and issues facing the residents in Seymour Lands, Trafalgar Park, the residential sections of New Kingston and other similar communities across Jamaica, which could easily be replicated across other urban centres in Jamaica. Parts II and III treats with some of the issues confronting the Jamaican Inner-city, whereas Part IV will look at possible solutions to the crisis that confronts the island.
The Jamaican Inner-City
Indeed, the Jamaican inner-city represents a paradox of sorts in that it embraces both formal and informal security mechanisms with the former being relied on primarily in times of extreme hardship. In that regard, there is a love-hate relationship between citizenry and police borne out of a protracted period of alienation between the two groups. Whereas the police are mandated and in fact has adopted as its credo, the notion “to protect and serve”, their interventions in the inner-city are usually in the form of police/military operations inclusive of raids. Though there are some routine patrols and efforts at community policing are attempted, there are most noted for raids.
Ironically, the matter of drug trafficking is almost a mainstay in sections of the Jamaican inner-city and is usually the source of income for the Area Leader. This ranges from marijuana to cocaine and some of the proceeds are used to trade for weapons. In the inner-city, smoking ganja is treated as no more of an infraction of the law than smoking a cigarette, though it remains illegal but cocaine is viewed as a drug. The drug trade has been at the root of several conflicts in inner cities island-wide, a matter that has been compounded by a surge in the number of persons deported to Jamaica. In fact, in 2007 alone some 2,984 such persons across all parishes were sent home. The largest proportion of persons deported to Jamaica in 2007, were those deported for drug offences (33.4 percent). This represents a 2.0 percent decline over 2006. It is interesting to note that most of the persons deported to Jamaica had returning addresses in St Catherine (653 or 21.9 percent), St James (229 or 7.7 percent), Clarendon (288 or 9.7 percent), Kingston (303 or 10.1 percent) and St Andrew (775 or 26.0 percent), which parishes boast the highest incidences of crime collectively accounting for 74.9 percent of all major crimes.
However, access to communities are sometimes impeded as most inner-city communities (particularly structured inner-city communities) have what can be characterized as an early warning system which manifests itself in manned roadblocks and “spotters”, usually armed men ensconced on the roofs of buildings with a mandate to repel any perceived threats. Whereas these early warning systems hinder the police in conducting their duties, the system has been primarily constituted to repel attacks from other communities (usually persons of different political persuasions and gang attacks among others). This as one of the more prevalent criminal activity in the inner cities has been drive-by shootings. Hence, most of the communities have an informal defense mechanism which requires persons including some adolescents to man these roadblocks and alert the community in the event that an attack or perceived attack is imminent.
The police by and large do not endear themselves to these communities as their acts of brutality, questionable shootings and generally anti-social behaviour does not foster good community relations. Indeed, recognizing that persons who generally inhabit these communities are from the poorest quintile, the complaint of damage to furniture and other household equipment and appliances are legendary. Further citizens, from time to time complain that they are subjected to on the spot searches and sometimes beaten for any perceived disrespect shown to the police and military. Citizens in the inner-city are also subject to what has been characterized as “net-fishing” exercises where large groups of males – usually between the ages of 18 – 24 – are placed in trucks and carried to a police station for “processing”. The police justify this by claiming that this is needed to determine whether or not these persons are wanted by the police, for questioning or whether or not there are any outstanding warrants for their arrest. However, the residents claim that this so-called “processing” usually involves ascertaining the persons name and address and precious little else.
The credibility of the JCF is not enhanced by forays into some communities and after expending thousands of rounds of ammunition, they have not effected any arrests, recovered any weaponry. Their credibility in terms of crime suppression is also questionable as traversing particularly the streets of the KSA at night it is not unusual to see persons near or in inner-city communities toting illegal weapons – usually high powered weapons- with impunity. The police are also notorious for detaining persons for relatively long periods of time without charge and without any legal representation. Indeed, the Jamaican court system is replete with writs of habeas corpus filed by attorneys-at–law seeking to have their clients released. These types of activities have led to formation of local Human Rights Groups such as Jamaicans for Justice (JFJ) and Families against State Terrorism (FAST). However, the police have a well-established complaints mechanism by way of the Bureau of Special Investigations (BSI), which routinely investigate questionable police shootings, and the Police Complaints Bureau, which investigates complaints about police excesses.
“Sweepers” and “Gun-Bags”
The inner-city communities boast their own structure in terms of crime scene management and criminal activity whereby after a particular ferocious and protracted battle with the security forces persons designated as “sweepers” (often-times children) are sent out to recover all spent shells. The children in some communities are oftentimes designated “gun-bag” – a designation referring to the person who actually has the weapon in his/her possession to be passed on to the adult for usage. The applied logic discerned was that under Jamaican law a child below the age of 12 cannot be deemed to be capable of committing a crime and so even if detected the worse that could happen, apart from being killed, would be that child be put in a place of safety or some other approved juvenile facility. Furthermore, the males in these communities tend to be reticent in the event of a police operation leaving the women and to some extent the children to “articulate” their collective disgust with the intervention. This does not seek to suggest that all are involved in this activity but the voices and actions of the few tend to tarnish the community’s reputations and perpetuates the cycle of violence.
Indeed, the Jamaican inner-city represents a paradox of sorts in that it embraces both formal and informal security mechanisms with the former being relied on primarily in times of extreme hardship. In that regard, there is a love-hate relationship between citizenry and police borne out of a protracted period of alienation between the two groups. Whereas the police are mandated and in fact has adopted as its credo, the notion “to protect and serve”, their interventions in the inner-city are usually in the form of police/military operations inclusive of raids. Though there are some routine patrols and efforts at community policing are attempted, there are most noted for raids.
Ironically, the matter of drug trafficking is almost a mainstay in sections of the Jamaican inner-city and is usually the source of income for the Area Leader. This ranges from marijuana to cocaine and some of the proceeds are used to trade for weapons. In the inner-city, smoking ganja is treated as no more of an infraction of the law than smoking a cigarette, though it remains illegal but cocaine is viewed as a drug. The drug trade has been at the root of several conflicts in inner cities island-wide, a matter that has been compounded by a surge in the number of persons deported to Jamaica. In fact, in 2007 alone some 2,984 such persons across all parishes were sent home. The largest proportion of persons deported to Jamaica in 2007, were those deported for drug offences (33.4 percent). This represents a 2.0 percent decline over 2006. It is interesting to note that most of the persons deported to Jamaica had returning addresses in St Catherine (653 or 21.9 percent), St James (229 or 7.7 percent), Clarendon (288 or 9.7 percent), Kingston (303 or 10.1 percent) and St Andrew (775 or 26.0 percent), which parishes boast the highest incidences of crime collectively accounting for 74.9 percent of all major crimes.
However, access to communities are sometimes impeded as most inner-city communities (particularly structured inner-city communities) have what can be characterized as an early warning system which manifests itself in manned roadblocks and “spotters”, usually armed men ensconced on the roofs of buildings with a mandate to repel any perceived threats. Whereas these early warning systems hinder the police in conducting their duties, the system has been primarily constituted to repel attacks from other communities (usually persons of different political persuasions and gang attacks among others). This as one of the more prevalent criminal activity in the inner cities has been drive-by shootings. Hence, most of the communities have an informal defense mechanism which requires persons including some adolescents to man these roadblocks and alert the community in the event that an attack or perceived attack is imminent.
The police by and large do not endear themselves to these communities as their acts of brutality, questionable shootings and generally anti-social behaviour does not foster good community relations. Indeed, recognizing that persons who generally inhabit these communities are from the poorest quintile, the complaint of damage to furniture and other household equipment and appliances are legendary. Further citizens, from time to time complain that they are subjected to on the spot searches and sometimes beaten for any perceived disrespect shown to the police and military. Citizens in the inner-city are also subject to what has been characterized as “net-fishing” exercises where large groups of males – usually between the ages of 18 – 24 – are placed in trucks and carried to a police station for “processing”. The police justify this by claiming that this is needed to determine whether or not these persons are wanted by the police, for questioning or whether or not there are any outstanding warrants for their arrest. However, the residents claim that this so-called “processing” usually involves ascertaining the persons name and address and precious little else.
The credibility of the JCF is not enhanced by forays into some communities and after expending thousands of rounds of ammunition, they have not effected any arrests, recovered any weaponry. Their credibility in terms of crime suppression is also questionable as traversing particularly the streets of the KSA at night it is not unusual to see persons near or in inner-city communities toting illegal weapons – usually high powered weapons- with impunity. The police are also notorious for detaining persons for relatively long periods of time without charge and without any legal representation. Indeed, the Jamaican court system is replete with writs of habeas corpus filed by attorneys-at–law seeking to have their clients released. These types of activities have led to formation of local Human Rights Groups such as Jamaicans for Justice (JFJ) and Families against State Terrorism (FAST). However, the police have a well-established complaints mechanism by way of the Bureau of Special Investigations (BSI), which routinely investigate questionable police shootings, and the Police Complaints Bureau, which investigates complaints about police excesses.
“Sweepers” and “Gun-Bags”
The inner-city communities boast their own structure in terms of crime scene management and criminal activity whereby after a particular ferocious and protracted battle with the security forces persons designated as “sweepers” (often-times children) are sent out to recover all spent shells. The children in some communities are oftentimes designated “gun-bag” – a designation referring to the person who actually has the weapon in his/her possession to be passed on to the adult for usage. The applied logic discerned was that under Jamaican law a child below the age of 12 cannot be deemed to be capable of committing a crime and so even if detected the worse that could happen, apart from being killed, would be that child be put in a place of safety or some other approved juvenile facility. Furthermore, the males in these communities tend to be reticent in the event of a police operation leaving the women and to some extent the children to “articulate” their collective disgust with the intervention. This does not seek to suggest that all are involved in this activity but the voices and actions of the few tend to tarnish the community’s reputations and perpetuates the cycle of violence.
See Also
1 comment:
This is the stark reality of innercity life in Jamaica. Wonder if the political will truly exists to confront these issues and identify and implement solutions?
Post a Comment