Forensic Audit Into Approval Process Needed

There is need for a comprehensive investigation, inclusive of full forensic audit into the building approval and enforcement processes in Jamaica. This being the inescapable conclusion, after the latest misstep which has been uncovered regarding a major hotel construction site in St James where reportedly but inexplicably a previously unauthorized fourth floor construction plan received surreptitious approval by way of a senior staff member of the local authority, but without the formal knowledge and approval of the St James Parish Council and the National Environment and Planning Agency (NEPA). Further, the amended construction plans were reportedly found in the Parish Council files, duly signed, stamped and allegedly back-dated, where they may well have remained buried, if the issues at hand did not involve a glaring issue of public safety.

Whereas, Mayor Charles Sinclair has ordered an immediate investigation into the most recent development, this may well be deemed to be insufficient, as there has been such a loss of legitimacy of both the Local Authorities (Parish Councils and KSAC) island wide and NEPA in terms of approvals and enforcement, that only an island wide probe ordered by Prime Minister Golding, will suffice at this time. Further given this alleged untoward development in St James and the long standing and deep rooted suspicions regarding the approval process, the State is incapable of providing credible assurances that similar occurrences do not or have not obtained in other parishes.

Indeed, examples of questionable approvals and poor enforcement has spanned decades and affects all parishes. In the case of the Golden Triangle and the residential sections of New Kingston, there are several examples of construction projects being given approval to construct for example studio apartments, only to have them later converted to one and two bedroom apartments. There has been illegal construction of basements and the state stipulations about setbacks, reserved green space and plot ratios remain largely academic. However in each case there would have to be a multi-agency review of plans coupled with site inspections bolstered by Surveyors and Architects reports coupled with the interventions of other industry professionals, so it remains inconceivable that obvious breaches would remain undetected. Indeed, so pervasive has been this activity, that the Trafalgar Council has on the basis of the Planning and Development manual published in 2007 by NEPA, declared “Most New Construction in Golden Triangle is Illegal”.

This is equally evidenced in other parts of the Corporate Area, with multi-storey dwellings and commercial buildings being constructed with absolutely no setback from boundary lines and yet being only detected, conveniently, when construction was either completed or near completion. To make matters worse, several of those projects were constructed in the midst of busy thoroughfares, teaming with vehicular and pedestrian traffic on a daily basis, yet the regulatory bodies claimed to be oblivious, until it was functionally too late. Equally in terms of enforcement, several blatant breaches have been reported over periods of time spanning decades with minimal to no action being taken. While cognizance is taken of a lack of agency capacity, the inordinate delays in investigation and the failure to follow-up raises serious issues about the integrity of the process. A simple example of one of the more nonsensical incidents involves the sudden failure to locate the addresses of commercial buildings boasting large signage displays and operating on popular roadways in the midst of residential communities, by personnel from regulatory agencies to serve enforcement notices or investigate breaches.

Similarly, in terms of several new constructions on the North Coast of Jamaica, setback ratios are routinely breached and issues such as sewerage disposal are so ineptly dealt with that questions regarding the process of oversight must be raised. Again, the breaches are so glaring that it would be impossible for them not to be determined by the regulatory bodies.

This lends additional credence to the oft-quoted aphorism that “…it is not merely of some importance but is of fundamental importance that justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done”. In fact Lord Chief Justice Hewart in his ruling further advised that “Nothing is to be done which creates even a suspicion that there has been an improper interference with the course of justice”. Whereas these comments form the basis for the precedence, under English Law, establishing the principle that the mere appearance of bias is sufficient to overturn a judicial decision, prudence would dictate that the Local Authorities, NEPA and the Town and Country Planning Authority among others be guided by its far reaching applicability and implications.

This, therefore raises the issue yet again, as to the role of the political directorate in the approval process particularly at the local level. Whereas in the instant case in St James, the Parish Council did not reportedly grant approval for the fourth floor of the hotel complex, there is a view that politicians at the local level across the island, have too much influence over the approval process and the prevailing ethos is such that it can actually foster corrupt activity, if persons are so minded. In this vein, Prime Minister Golding’s suggestion that a single entity be established to treat with building approvals may well be part of the solution, however in the interim, it seems only appropriate that a radical staff restructuring exercise be embarked upon involving employees associated with building approvals and enforcement in the regulatory bodies and that political personnel populating the critical planning committees be rotated off these bodies. Indeed, at the level of membership of the Town and Country Planning Authority and the Board of Directors at NEPA, it would seem appropriate that such appointments be limited to 12 month intervals, preserving the integrity of the process and again reducing even the perception of corruption. These entities all have substantial power and in the absence of functional oversight can become corrupted and hence the appropriate system controls must be instituted to preserve the integrity of the process.

For too long have accusations been levelled about corruption and cronyism, regarding building approvals in Jamaica and its therefore timely for a full forensic audit to be conducted and a dispassionate determination of the truth made. In the event corruption and graft is discovered, those responsible would be expected to be punished to the fullest extent under the law.

Re-Engineer the Approval Process in Jamaica

“All I wish is for my children to be able to take a breath of fresh air in Jamaica by the time they are forty years of age!” For many Jamaicans, this has become their singular yet unselfish ideal, borne out of enlightened self-interest, given the environmental degradation being occasioned by the poor oversight responsibility exercised by the regulatory agencies coupled with a paucity of political will. Indeed for many, their dreams have been shattered by decades of economic malaise and a mounting casual disregard by the State for proper urban planning strategies, which are being sacrificed on an altar of expediency and short-termism. For example, in Seymour Lands and the residential sections of New Kingston, the current building boom while been marked by widespread breaches of the State’s regulatory framework for urban planning, also highlights the contempt with which sustainable environmental practices are treated. However, this contempt is also being replicated across the other urban centres in Jamaica. Some of the imperatives are highlighted below:

Legal Overhaul
Indeed, while there is heightened construction activity in Seymour Lands, there remains no enforceable mechanism to treat with Air Pollution emanating from construction sites and even for the appropriate disposal of construction waste. Whereas a protocol does exist for the Disposal of Construction Waste, it is breached with impunity and therefore has lost its legitimacy. As a result it is estimated that the air quality in the above community has deteriorated by some 30 – 40 percent, with the attendant increases in respiratory ailments among the citizenry. This points to the need for a protocol which is actually enforceable. Further, it is critical that the laws governing construction activity in general be reviewed. For instance, the Building Code which currently obtains in Jamaica was drafted in 1907. Similarly development in Kingston and St Andrew is supposed to be guided by a Development Order prepared in 1966, however in the current context there is seemingly a more laissez faire approach to development. Equally the principle of adverse possession and the Limitations of Action Act need to be revisited and placed in a modern context to facilitate orderly development and once and for all discourage antisocial activity inclusive of spontaneous settlement (squatting) on private lands. Current squatting laws only protects Crown Lands and therefore reflects a deficiency that should be addressed with urgency. Therefore in essence there is need for a comprehensive review of all laws governing development in Jamaica inclusive of the NRCA Act which should be amended to facilitate the compulsory consultation of the citizenry regarding any developments within their respective communities.

Densities and the Environment
Similarly, the matter of linking increased densities to access to a central sewer line would deceptively appear to indicate environmental consciousness on the part of the State. However, in the context of the parishes of Kingston and St Andrew, the Soapberry Waste Water Treatment Plant is now just being commissioned into service putting to an end a period of years when there were no functional treatment plants. Even so, according to KSAC Mayor Senator Desmond McKenzie only 35% of residencies in the Corporate Area are attached to the sewer system with the majority in the foreseeable future continuing to rely on more traditional waste disposal mechanisms. However, just being in relative close proximity to the sewer line (attached or not) in Seymour Lands and other areas increases the density from 30 to 50 habitable rooms per acre and attracts a 100% surcharge on water bills, whether or not there is a functional treatment plant. Further, this has not impacted the continued flow of 20 million gallons of waste water and 1.5 million gallons of solid waste into the Kingston Harbour daily and puts paid to any notion of environmental sensitivity on the part of the State.

Enforcement
Similarly, stipulations for plot ratios, setback ratios and the minimum green area space established by the National Environment and Planning Agency (NEPA) are equally frequently breached facilitating a sustainable development crisis in many urban centres in Jamaica. To compound this issue, there is a lack of capacity at the level of the local authority (in this case the KSAC) and NEPA to engage in a meaningful and sustainable enforcement and monitoring exercise. For example, the KSAC now boasts a complement of 6 Building officers up from 2 in 2006/7, to police all construction activities and enforcement issues across the parishes of Kingston and St Andrew. Further both agencies lack any financial incentive to embark on any meaningful enforcement exercise. Firstly both are at least partially funded by the Government of Jamaica and given budgetary constraints operate primarily in a parsimonious environment. Hence, in the main they are unable / unwilling to engage in any form of corrective legal activity. Further, even if they engage persons functioning in breach of the law and are successful in a court of law, any monetary award does not inure to the benefit of the regulatory body, to even cover legal costs but are turned over in their entirety to the Consolidated Fund of the State. This has led to a situation where the regulatory bodies are actively encouraging citizens to challenge developers in the courts to address breaches rather than seeking to fulfil their statutory obligations. This is clearly an untenable scenario.

Preserving Process Integrity
Also as part of the approval process, varying committees are established to review and adjudicate applications with the Prime Minister who has portfolio responsibility for Planning and Development being the final arbiter in the event of an appeal by a developer. The first area of concern must be the KSAC Building and Town Planning Committee, which boasts a significant number of politicians ( with no discernible relevant areas of expertise) coupled with a few technocrats determining the process. This is a dangerous practice and increased emphasis needs to placed on the technocrats with the involvement by the political directorate being minimal and such participation occurring on a rotating basis to avoid even a perception of corruption. There is also the need for a strengthened oversight process coupled with greater autonomy for the local authorities to seek redress through the courts. Similarly for both the Local Authority and NEPA, persons affiliated with enforcement activity should be rotated from time to time ( perhaps after every 6 – 12 months) so as to avoid undue familiarity between staff and developers and preserving the integrity of the process and again reducing even the perception of corruption. In this regard any breach by personnel must be dealt with harshly and swiftly under the Corruption Prevention Act and / or any other applicable law. Further, whereas there has been some capacity building, particularly at the level of the local authority, there are particular concerns regarding the quality of decisions being made. For example, in Seymour Lands and the residential sections of New Kingston, there is feverish construction activity with respect to high density developments but there has been no increase in water supplies, which leads to reduced water pressure or no water at times, yet there is no slowdown in the pace of approvals.

The Voice of the People
Finally, the process needs to facilitate the involvement of the community based organizations at every stage of the application and enforcement processes. This has been a particularly vexed issue for a protracted period, as the views of citizens in the main are given minimal to no weight in a process that often times affects their living environment, property values among other issues. In fact the system has become so compromised that for example, developers rarely seek to address matters relating to the Discharge or Modification of Restrictive Covenants prior to the commencement of construction as they are obliged to do but which would necessitate the involvement of the citizenry, but instead seek to regularize the process on a de facto basis. Even in the cases of breaches, the involvement of the citizens is minimal and response times so slow (some might argue deliberately) that by the time the respective regulatory body intervenes there is certain knowledge that nothing can or will be done. Not only has this led to a loss of legitimacy of the process but has led to an overall deterioration in the quality of life being experienced in residential communities as unscrupulous developers recognising the deficiencies have sought to engage in varying activities which in some cases threaten to ruin the character and ambiance of some residential communities. Hence whereas cognizance is taken of the desire of the State to streamline the approval process due care must be exercised that the requisite control mechanisms are established to finally inculcate the concept and functional tenets of sustainable development.

An Open Letter to Prime Minister Golding

Dear Prime Minister,

While we are cognizant of the fact that the Jamaican government is now seized with the prospect of facilitating accelerated development and whereas such a policy thrust is welcomed. there are some concerns which we believe are worthy of your consideration prior to effecting any changes to the development process as currently obtains. Indeed we note that in the past two to three days an unprecedented assault has been launched against the the National Environment and Planning Agency (NEPA) and the Kingston and St Andrew Corporation (KSAC) by investors / developers citing their intent to commence multi-billion dollar investments and claiming that such investments are being stymied by the regulatory arm of the state apparatus.

Whereas concerns about the operations and efficacy of the two entities have been repeatedly raised, due care must be taken that the process is not hijacked and allowed to degenerate into an opportunistic exercise on which success is predicated on the bypassing of the requisite control mechanisms which would afford these and similar developments a degree of sustainability over the medium to long term. Further there are those which posit the view that that the planning focus in Jamaica, should shift from exclusionary zoning to a more inclusive strategy, which would allow commercial and residential developments to coexist. Ostensibly, this should address issues such as travel times to work and play, coupled with matters such as energy usage and so on. This presupposes that Jamaica boasts a well developed urban planning strategy with an effective monitoring mechanism with meaningful penalties. The simple truth is Jamaica has satisfied none of those preconditions, which would be critical in this exercise.

The KSAC now reportedly boasts a total of six (6) building officers who are responsible for enforcement and inspections for the parishes of Kingston and St Andrew and there are similar concerns about the existing capacity at NEPA which boasts island-wide responsibilities. Further in the communities of Seymour Lands, Trafalgar Park and the residential sections of New Kingston, (hitherto referred to as the Trafalgar Council communities) given their centralized location, are no more than 5 minutes away from well established and zoned commercial zones with numerous entertainment facilities precluding the need for the addition of those activities within the residential communities.

Prime Minister, over the past week The Trafalgar Council has had meetings with both NEPA and the KSAC and whereas a process of meaningful dialogue has commenced, the issues which confront us are not localized and in our opinion deserves your intervention as the Minister with portfolio responsibility for Planning and Development in Jamaica. Indeed, some the immediate challenges being faced by the citizens of the Trafalgar Council communities, are dust pollution, noise pollution and a flawed urban planning process which does not functionally afford the residents an opportunity for input. However, the difficulties described are already covered in most part by varying laws but there is almost no enforcement or such enforcement is so selective, as to be deemed arbitrary.

Specifically, the issues which confront the residents which fall under the jurisdiction of the Trafalgar Council are as follows:

Setback distances: The setback ratios (distance between the building and the property line) has been unilaterally altered to five (5) feet per floor which routinely leads to issues of overshadowing and overlooking adjoining properties coupled with loss of privacy particularly in the current circumstances where there are extraordinarily high plot-ratios (plot ratio defines the total floor area of buildings permitted to be erected on a site). Further in the absence of effective monitoring by the regulatory agencies, in several cases developers breach these guidelines, with very little recourse to affected parties. Indeed in several cases, the setback distances are so low and plot ratios so high that the construction sites cannot accommodate their own equipment, materials or waste on-site and therefore developers have resorted to use the sidewalks and roadways as their storage facility. There is also no mitigating strategy to treat with dust pollution emanating from these construction sites and hence there is an increase in respiratory ailments within the Seymour Lands and New Kingston communities in particular as there has been an appreciable deterioration in air quality;

Density Ratios: This has again been unilaterally altered by the regulatory authorities from 30 to 50 habitable rooms per acre in the vicinity of sewer mains. This has been a particularly egregious example of the abuse of state power, as the citizens of the Seymour Lands in particular rejected this notion when it was proposed at a public consultation by NEPA in 2006. However, the effect has been the preponderance of 4 storey apartment blocks which is not only out of step with the prevailing ambiance of the communities but make little to no provision for any green areas whatsoever. The matter has been further compounded by the fact that the Soapberry Treatment Plant is only now being commissioned, which means that the previous utterances about environmental concerns, justifying the laying of sewer pipes were a mere facade to facilitate increased densities. Indeed prior to Soapberry there was no functional treatment plant in Kingston and St Andrew for several years.

Poor Supporting Infrastructure: Whereas the regulatory bodies have approved these higher density developments in The Trafalgar Council communities, the supporting infrastructure has not been upgraded to accommodate these developments. Water supply has been a particular concern in this regard, as no new supplies have been brought into the Trafalgar Council Communities, despite a plethora of high density developments receiving state approvals over the past three (3) years. However according to data provided by the National Water Commission (NWC) and reported in the Economic and Social Survey (2008), water production for Kingston, St Andrew and St Thomas declined by 7.2 percent in 2006 and increased by a mere 2.7 percent in 2007. In the meantime, the number of connections in the above named parishes, increased by a whopping 14.9 percent in 2007 alone. This explains the low water pressure or in other cases the absence of water from the affected communities, a situation which worsens with the addition of each new development. Similarly, the roads are deteriorating considerably under the increased traffic flows and atrocious rehabilitative work facilitated by the KSAC and the National Works Agency (NWA).

Poor Enforcement Mechanisms: The communities are buffeted by numerous breaches of the building codes coupled with breaches associated with improper property usage. There is the instance of a sensuous massage parlour being given State Approval and even though the error was acknowledged no remedial action has to date been taken. There are other instances where buildings are constructed on top of boundary walls or extended to adjoining boundary walls. However, when challenged the regulatory agencies advise that given budgetary constraints and the fact that even when they prevail in a court of law any financial award is turned over to the Consolidated Fund, there is no particular impetus to take legal action. In fact in recent times, the State regulatory agencies have increasingly been seeking to shift the responsibility to individual citizens to take remedial action. Similarly, where applicable, where there is need for Discharge and/or Modification of Restrictive Covenants, this is supposed to be determined prior to the commencement of construction, but in most cases this is done after the fact and with no reference to the owners of adjoining properties.

Creeping Commercialization: The fact, that the Trafalgar Council communities are in fact zoned for residential usage only, has not served to deter the scourge of creeping commercialization. With dead frontages and no human activity by night in some instances, this has led to increases in criminal activity and has forced the residents in the main to rely on private security firms to provide additional support to the Police Force. In other cases where business activity occurs primarily at night, there are routine problems associated with night noises and poor sanitary control coupled with loss of privacy and on street parking. In the days there is a considerable increase in traffic resulting from the commercial entities operations and a preponderance of on-street parking with resulting impact of impeding access to residences

Prime Minister, we therefore appeal to you as you prepare for what we are confident will be another thought provoking presentation in the Budget Debates, that due consideration be given to the issues raised here, which not only affect the named communities but are replicated across other urban centres. Jamaica prides itself as operating a modern democracy, but such modernity dictates that a well developed process of consultation between State and citizen must be observed and cannot be routinely ignored outside the electoral periods. It is therefore believed that with the citizens being included in the development process and their views being solicited and given weight to in the approval process, will lead to an enrichment of the process of development while by no means interfering with the timeliness of the decision making process. In that regard, we are cognizant of your expressed intent to enact a single piece of legislation that is applicable to all regulatory agencies in the process of development. However we would suggest that for the new legislation to be worthwhile, it should clarify the position on public consultation in an unequivocal manner and encompass provisions for compulsory consultations with the citizenry. Failure to accept the tenets of a modern democracy and continuing to relegate the role of the citizen to be a mere bystander in the process of development is to undermine the political process and foster social instability with its attendant ills.

Jamaica: The 90-day Approval Process Revealed

Flawed Urban Planning?: Impact of the 5 ft. per floor setback distance (Click on pic. for closer view)

Jamaican Prime Minister Bruce Golding, is insistent in his desire to restrict the building approval process to 90-days and by so doing, revolutionize the development process in the island. Indeed according to Mr Golding, he is shifting the impetus in the development process from the developer to the regulators. But what are the processes to be completed during this 90 day interval? Significantly, these processes are outlined in Ministry Paper 7 which was tabled in 1999 and which provided detailed guidance on the monitoring framework necessary to ensure that the 90-day target was achieved. Implementation of Ministry Paper No. 7 has been deemed an integral part of the Development Approval Project within the Ministry of Industry, Investment and Commerce which has obviously been embraced by the new Golding regime.

Under the new dispensation it is apparent that the Office of the Prime Minister (OPM) has the overall "ownership" of the development approval process. Specifically, based on press reports OPM will be required to collect monitoring information on the development approval bodies' achievement of the 90 day approval processing target. The Planning and Development Division is the lead Department at OPM in this regard. The Town Planning Department must provide information to OPM regarding outstanding applications. In addition, the Town Planning Department will make recommendations on applications where one or more commenting agency fails to provide recommendations within the agreed time frame. The detailed breakdown of the 90-day target outlined in Ministry Paper No. 7, 1999 is shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Maximum Time Allocations Necessary to Achieve a 90-Day Assessment Process

KSAC/Parish Council/Local Planning Authority sends completed application to Town Planning Department. (part of NEPA) - 2 weeks (This period is not included in the 90-day calculation)

Town Planning Department receives completed application from Parish Council/KSAC/Local Planning Authority and sends application to critical commenting agencies - 2 weeks (The 90-day target commences from the time when a completed application is received by the Town Planning Department)

Commenting agencies assess application and make recommendation to Town Planning Department - 3 weeks

If applicable Town Planning Department takes application to the Subdivision Committee or takes a decision on the application - 2 weeks

Town Planning Department advises Parish Council/KSAC/Local Planning Authority of its recommendation and advises Ministry of Environment and Housing (now OPM) of outstanding applications - 1 week

KSAC/Parish Council/Local Planning Authority makes a determination on the application and advises the applicant - 4 weeks

Ministry Paper 7, 1999 & Author's updates

However this process obviously excludes any meaningful interaction with affected third parties, meaning neighbours and persons within the footprint of the development project. It also seemingly excludes the usage of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA’s) and would make redundant the current 3-week time interval stipulated by NEPA for public notice to discuss the findings of EIA’s. Also, there is no stipulation that matters relating to the Discharge or Modification of Restrictive Covenants should be dealt with as a condition precedent for project approval. There is also an absence of a prescribed oversight procedure despite so much power being vested in the Town Planning Department as well as any provision for appeals by aggrieved parties.

Whereas the impatience of the Government of Jamaica to facilitate increased investment is quite understandable due care must be exercised that long established industry and national safeguards are not sacrificed on the altar of expediency. Already some unilateral decisions have been made by the State, regarding set-back distances and density ratios, the legality of which are likely to be challenged in the courts. Further there is need for continued and expanded dialogue with the citizenry in the process of development as is dictated in any modern democracy. Failure to adhere to the basic tenets of good governance, would only lead to a continued process of disconnect between the State and the citizenry and undermine the requisite partnerships that are deemed critical to the development process.

What Price for Development in Jamaica

It is indeed ironic, that the Jamaican society is now seized with the notion of facilitating accelerating development, but the strategy is opportunistic at best. in so far as it ignores all requisite control mechanisms, which would afford these developments a degree of sustainability over the medium to long term. Indeed, some the immediate challenges being faced by the citizenry are dust pollution, noise pollution and flawed urban planning compounded by an increasingly aloof and arrogant state mechanism. However, the difficulties described are already covered in most part by varying laws but there is almost no enforcement or such enforcement is so selective, as to be deemed arbitrary.

This has led to a loss of legitimacy for the state apparatus, which is supposed to police the named categories. For example, with the boom in construction activity in Seymour Lands (Golden Triangle) there is no effective dust pollution control mechanism. Hence, the air quality in the community has deteriorated substantially over the past few years and despite persistent appeals to the regulatory agencies, nothing is done. Similarly, the Chairman of the Kingston and St Andrew Corporation (KSAC) and Mayor, Senator Desmond McKenzie, indicated earlier this year that a zero tolerance approach would be taken regarding the storage of construction materials on the sidewalks and roadways. No action has been taken. Indeed at one particular construction site in the Golden Triangle, the contractor has from inception not only stored his material on the sidewalks near to the project but routinely stored excess materials on the sidewalks of nearby roads. However, in this regard the KSAC inexplicably remains impotent.

Similarly, the residents of Seymour Lands, Trafalgar Park and the residential sections of New Kingston are all affected by night noises and the failure of the police to enforce the Noise Abatement Act. While the new Commissioner of Police Rear Admiral Hardley Lewin, has expressed an intention to treat with breaches, the fact that approval was recently given to J’ouvert celebrants to commence their road march and party activities at 2 am, militates against any particular expectations that the status quo will change. However, in the interim, in some of the high priced gated communities, persons are only allowed to sleep at the absolute discretion of the party promoters and club operators as to when they chose to terminate their nocturnal activities.

Equally, residents in the Kensington Avenue area in New Kingston have been afflicted by helicopter landings and departures from the nearby Mutual Life Centre. Though appeals have been made to the Civil Aviation Authority (to effect a change to the approved flight plans so as to minimize impact) nothing has been done. This situation is such though that roofing tiles in some of the apartment complexes have been falling out, given the vibrations from the low-flying helicopter.

Further, the State apparatus has given approval for the operations of at least one sensuous massage parlour and that particular activity is expanding considerably in the named communities above. Repeated complaints have been made to the relevant authorities and mistakes acknowledged, yet absolutely no remedial action has been taken. There has no been no activity seeking to prevent the operations of the newer facilities either.

Similarly, density ratios and setback distances have been unilaterally altered which ensures that any new multi-storey dwelling automatically will overshadow and overlook its immediate neighbours, creating a loss of value among other ills. Further, in all cases there is no provision made for additional water to be piped into the communities yet additional developments are approved routinely. Developers are also required to post signage regarding their proposed developments. In most cases this is completely ignored, as is the fact that the restrictive covenants in the majority of cases need to be modified or discharged prior to construction. These activities occur routinely after the fact.

Hence for Jamaica’s development to be sustained there is need for the introduction and enforcement of order. The KSAC, NEPA and the Police have all failed in the effective discharge of their duties so far. There is therefore an urgent need for a new approach to development to be adopted, as the current mechanisms which pits citizen against developer and the state is not tenable and will only serve to undermine true progress and stymie sustainable development. The law may well be a tool of social engineering, but failure to adhere to its tenets will lead to the unraveling of the very fabric of the Jamaican society.