Minister of State with responsibility for Local Government Robert “Bobby” Montague has been reported by the Gleaner as stating that “the parish council as an institution has the capacity and the capability to man and police the new (building) code”. However, at the Kingston and St Andrew Corporation (KSAC), the largest of the local authorities (parish councils), there is a Planning Department with reportedly 6 building officers (up from 2 inspectors / enforcement officers in 2006) for the parishes of Kingston and St Andrew. These officers are charged with the responsibility to inspect all building sites requiring KSAC approval, investigate and follow-up on all complaints about illegal land uses and spearhead any legal action required. Ironically the KSAC advises that where successful legal action has been undertaken any financial award must be transferred in its entirety to the consolidated fund with the local authority being responsible for any legal fees incurred. This has led to sub-optimal performances and has resulted in a continued loss of legitimacy for the Local Authority.
Further, as highlighted by the Chairman of the Association of Local Government Authorities (ALGA) Mayor Milton Brown in a recent Gleaner Editors Forum, in response to a question regarding the breakdown in enforcement of development breaches, there is a “fear factor” that was of real concern in that regard. This has led to situations where enforcement notices are issued but never served as inexplicably the addresses for the premises or the owners of said premises can now longer be found. Indeed, in the case of their enforcement counterpart in the Corporate Area, the National Environment and Planning Agency, NEPA, homeowners are advised that in the event of a breach of use, for an enforcement notice to be served, both the owner and the tenant, if applicable, must be on the premises in dispute at the same time of service. Of course this scenario also opens the possibility for corrupt practices to take root and due care must be exercised that this does not occur or is stymied when it does.
Indeed in a statement dated March 12 2008, The Trafalgar Council noted its concerns “that work at a controversial building site on Donhead Avenue in Seymour Lands, where a fatality occurred earlier this week, had continued undetected by the Building Inspectors for approximately six weeks after the initial cease and desist order was allegedly issued on January 22, 2008”. Further, The Council noted that “this issue points to a flawed process of oversight, by the Local Authority and can only serve to undermine the effectiveness of the rules and principles, governing the building trade. Whereas, this may be reflective of inadequate capacity at the level of the local authority, the issues at hand are so grave that they must be addressed urgently, in an effort to optimize efficiency, as the current modus operand is untenable”.
Further, as highlighted by the Chairman of the Association of Local Government Authorities (ALGA) Mayor Milton Brown in a recent Gleaner Editors Forum, in response to a question regarding the breakdown in enforcement of development breaches, there is a “fear factor” that was of real concern in that regard. This has led to situations where enforcement notices are issued but never served as inexplicably the addresses for the premises or the owners of said premises can now longer be found. Indeed, in the case of their enforcement counterpart in the Corporate Area, the National Environment and Planning Agency, NEPA, homeowners are advised that in the event of a breach of use, for an enforcement notice to be served, both the owner and the tenant, if applicable, must be on the premises in dispute at the same time of service. Of course this scenario also opens the possibility for corrupt practices to take root and due care must be exercised that this does not occur or is stymied when it does.
Indeed in a statement dated March 12 2008, The Trafalgar Council noted its concerns “that work at a controversial building site on Donhead Avenue in Seymour Lands, where a fatality occurred earlier this week, had continued undetected by the Building Inspectors for approximately six weeks after the initial cease and desist order was allegedly issued on January 22, 2008”. Further, The Council noted that “this issue points to a flawed process of oversight, by the Local Authority and can only serve to undermine the effectiveness of the rules and principles, governing the building trade. Whereas, this may be reflective of inadequate capacity at the level of the local authority, the issues at hand are so grave that they must be addressed urgently, in an effort to optimize efficiency, as the current modus operand is untenable”.
A new building code is critical as the country continues to be guided in law by the Building Code of 1902. However, when faced with a scenario where in the case of the KSAC, the size of their Building Committee is larger than the quantum of building officers employed to police the most populous sections of the country, there is cause for alarm. Similarly in St Catherine, with a population in excess of 400,000 persons there are a mere 5 building officers, which is equally preposterous. Therefore in the final analysis, it must be concluded that the Local Authorities do not have the capacity or the capability to supervise the new building code, whenever it is actually enacted. Indeed, they have failed to effectively police current building breaches and there are no new discernible strategies which would facilitate renewed optimism.
See Also
No comments:
Post a Comment